Congregation Kneseth Israel in Annapolis, Maryland
  • What's Happening
    • Location & Contact
  • About us
    • Meet Rabbi/Cantor David Sislen
    • Our Proud History
    • Life Cycle Events >
      • Brit Milah and Baby Naming
      • Bar and Bat Mitzvah
      • Weddings
      • Funerals, Cemetery and Jewish Burials
    • Sisterhood
  • Worship
  • Membership
    • Dues Payment
  • Donate Today
    • Online Donations
  • Support for Ukraine
  • Rabbi Ruminations
  • In The Community

Parshat of the Week -- Vayeshev

11/25/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
There can be little doubt as to why Joseph’s brothers don’t care for him. The arrogant youth (he’s 17) has become the de facto firstborn, displacing Reuven, due to Jacob’s favoritism. Young Joseph has the audacity to share his dreams of future superiority with the entire family, including Jacob, who curiously admonishes, but does not correct, his son. The brothers were understandably jealous. We know what happens next. Some time passes, and Joseph is sent to check on his brothers who are pasturing the sheep near Shechem. Seeing him from afar, the brothers conspire to kill him and toss the body in a pit, but Reuven convinces the others to spare Joseph, intending to return later and free him. At Yehuda’s suggestion, Joseph is instead sold into slavery, passing through multiple hands until he ends up in Egypt where he lays the groundwork for the next part of our national experience. Reading between the lines, however, there are a number of pieces which don’t add up. First off, why would the brothers be grazing the flocks near Shechem? After having deceived, circumcised, and murdered all the male inhabitants of the city, that wasn’t exactly friendly territory for the Israelites. Knowing his brothers’ dislike of him, why did Joseph even go? Did he think they forgot his arrogance? And why are only two of the conspirators named?

We know that the brothers will be the eventual leaders of the twelve tribes (trust me, I’ve read the book). Sforno points out that all twelve tribes will ultimately be recognized together as stones on the High Priest’s breastplate. Surely, if they were unworthy, they would not have merited the honor.  Sforno makes a fascinating suggestion. The brothers were afraid of Joseph, not jealous of him. They had ventured into dangerous territory to avoid him, fearful that he was conspiring against them, using his influence to discredit or kill them, not the other way around. When they say, “Then we will see what will become of his dreams! (Gen 37:20)”, the brothers are not speaking sarcastically; they’re actually afraid that the dreams
will come true. They try to find ways to eliminate the threat indirectly so as not to be technically guilty of murder. According to various sources, they try to kill him with arrows (so they can claim that they were not physically present) and with wild dogs (“it was them, not us), and when neither of these work, a group of unnamed brothers finally suggest killing him by hand. Reuven and Yehuda, however, are named because they have already started to learn and grow. They realize that it was, indeed, foolish for Joseph to venture out to find them, far away from home and their father’s sight and protection. Reuven, at least, suspects that he must have a different motive. Indeed he does. Joseph wanders around in the fields seeking them out at his own peril, fulfilling his promise to Jacob; thereby honoring their father.  According to tradition, it was for that same reason that Reuven hadn’t been present to save Joseph; it was his turn to go home and care for Jacob. The family dynamic is going to get more complicated before it gets better, but it is here that the seeds of healing are planted, and the ones who are starting to show signs of leadership and maturity are aptly rewarded with their names.

Shabbat ShalomRabbi/Hazzan David B. Sislen
0 Comments

Parshat of the Week -- Vayishlach

11/20/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
Ok, let’s face it. Jacob suffered from an Edifice Complex. One of the patriarch’s most endearing qualities was how he constantly recognized significant events in his life by renaming the location where they occurred, creating a monument, or both. There are at least half a dozen examples in this parsha alone, not counting the previous locations to which he returns. Fittingly, Jacob himself will be renamed Israel twice in this parsha; first after struggling with the angel, and then again by G-d Himself. Ironically, we learn from the commentary (Rashi and others) that the angels themselves are nameless; they are identified by their heavenly tasks. When Jacob asks his adversary for his name, he is rebuffed. Later on, in the book of Judges, Manoach asks the same question of the angel who had presaged the birth of Samson, and is told that his angelic name is “unknowable.” Conferring a new name and its inherent significance to a particular time and place is a very human, and a very Jewish, pursuit. Lighting the candles and saying a blessing turns an ordinary weekday into the holiness of Shabbat. Gathering together with at least 9 others to pray sanctifies an ordinary room as a place for us to talk to G-d. Naming a child after a relative who has passed grants them a measure of immortality. May we all learn from Jacob; and never forget that one of our greatest blessings is the ability to assign meaning and significance to time and space. So much so that it lifts us above the angels.

Shabbat ShalomRabbi/Hazzan David B. Sislen
0 Comments

Parshat of the Week -- Vayetze

11/12/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
In a parsha rich with allusions and echoes of other situations and stories, it’s hard to choose any single one to focus upon. But here’s one which jumped out to me. During his iconic dream of the angelic ladder, G-d tells Jacob (Genesis 28:14) that his descendants will be as the dust of the earth, spreading to the west, east, north, and south. What a curious metaphor to use in the context of a blessing! We’re used to poetic terminology to describe our progeny in the Torah; as numerous as the stars in the heavens or the sand on the beach. But the dust of the earth? Rabbi Ovadia Sforno (15th century) suggests a reason for the allusion. Sforno’s commentary says that only after suffering degradation can we achieve greatness. In other words, we must reach the low in order to achieve the high. The Zohar takes this concept to the extreme. Since Jacob (Ya’akov)’s name refers to his heel, the masterwork of Jewish mysticism equates Jacob with our constantly having the yetzer hara, the evil inclination, pulling us down by the foot. We, as did Jacob, will prevail, allowing the resultant triumph of good over evil to go viral. We will be pulled down, as a nation, a people, a religion, and a culture. But when we get up again, the benefits of what we have experienced will make all the difference for those who we can influence. We will all sink into the depths at some point. But we have the ability to use the lows to change the resultant highs. And then, the goodness we can add to the world will, indeed, spread like dust in every direction, carried by the wind of humanity.

Shabbat ShalomRabbi/Hazzan David B. Sislen
0 Comments

Parshat of the Week -- Toldot

11/4/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
Could any of us be so blind that we would not be able to tell our children apart? In describing Isaac’s blindness, the Torah uses a curious turn of phrase. A literal reading of the text says that “his eyes had dimmed from seeing,” not that he was blind due to advanced age. We know that Jacob has purchased the birthright from Esau, and that the elder brother is not suited to be the leader of the next generation of Israel. We also know that G-d has clued Rebecca in on the plan; Jacob will emerge as the next patriarch of the family. But there is a level of plausible deniability which needs to be maintained. The rabbis and the Midrash all seem to agree that Isaac’s blindness is too convenient, and occurs for symbolic, as well as practical reasons. Among the suppositions: the smoke from Esau’s wives’ idolatrous offerings temporarily obscured Isaac’s vision, the tears of the angels who wept at the binding of Isaac had clouded his vision, that G-d simply removed Isaac’s sight long enough for Jacob to receive the blessing, or that Isaac’s blindness was a fitting punishment for his inability to properly instruct or punish Esau’s sinful and violent ways. The irony is that the only character in the entire scenario who is truly in the dark is the one who should have been in control from the start. Isaac’s shortsightedness is a lesson for us all. It is all to easy for us to be blinded, distracted, misdirected, or subverted. Unlike Isaac, it is incumbent upon all of us to make certain that we have our eyes open at all times, knowing what G-d wants from us, and doing our share as part of the Divine plan.

Shabbat Shalom
Rabbi/Hazzan David B. Sislen
0 Comments

    Archives

    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.