Congregation Kneseth Israel in Annapolis, Maryland
  • What's Happening
    • Location & Contact
  • About us
    • Meet Rabbi/Cantor David Sislen
    • Our Proud History
    • Life Cycle Events >
      • Brit Milah and Baby Naming
      • Bar and Bat Mitzvah
      • Weddings
      • Funerals, Cemetery and Jewish Burials
    • Sisterhood
  • Worship
  • Membership
    • Dues Payment
  • Donate Today
    • Online Donations
  • Support for Ukraine
  • Rabbi Ruminations
  • In The Community

Passover Message

4/18/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
One of the most charming moments of our Passover Seder is when the youngest child asks the Ma Nishtana, the Four Questions. For some, it’s the joy of seeing and hearing a child, grandchild, or great-grandchild ask them for the first time. For others, it’s the inherent humor of having the honor pass to a child who is well into adulthood, since they happen to be the youngest at the table. Either way, it’s an iconic ritual which centers on an ancient Jewish ritual: the asking of rhetorical questions. 

If you think about it, the Four Questions seem to appear in the wrong place. If a child’s curiosity is going be aroused, it should be an immediate response to a sensory stimulation. Most of the rituals about which the child asks haven’t happened yet in the Seder, other than maybe the introductory one (Why is this night different…). Our learned rabbis (Chazal) give us many possible explanations. The Mishna teaches that if the youngster does not have the intellect to formulate their own questions, that it is the responsibility of the child’s parents to teach them the Ma Nishtana so that four basic questions (plus the introductory one) will fulfill the commandment. Rambam interprets the text as meaning that a child should be encouraged to ask random questions according to their capacity, but that the parents should ensure that the requirements of the Mishna are met. Another source, however, suggests that a child who can formulate his own questions exempts all from the Mishnaic requirement. Then there is the practice cited in Talmud P’sachim: the table with all the food is removed, then gradually returned dish by dish, in order to spark the child’s curiosity. 

Seems like an awfully complicated set of formalities just to get some ritual questions asked, especially since the answers don’t change much from year to year. Or do they? We can tick off the questions and their answers as they relate to the Seder from memory, but this somewhat arcane practice serves to teach us something even more important: asking a rhetorical question is a means to an end. There’s always something more to learn, and even more importantly, a way we can and should be inspired to action. 

Look around our world. There’s so much surrounding us about which we ask “why?” even though we know the answer. In Ukraine, Yemen, Sudan, and so many other places around the world, for those suffering from COVID or its derivative effects social, political, and economic, this Pesach our challenge should be to change and expand the narrative. The real question is, “What have I done?” When we eat the Bread of Affliction, let’s remember to do something for those who are hungry. Then do it. When we eat bitter herbs, lets vow to help those whose life has recently turned bitter, through no fault of their own. As we dip our food twice as in the days of the Haggadah, let’s promise to turn our fundamentally wasteful eating style into one which can benefit all.  Finally, when we recline as we observe the Seder, we can resolve to do our part to offer a place of rest and respite to those migrants worldwide who are fleeing oppression and war. 

If we can allow the familiar words of a misplaced set of rhetorical questions to not just entertain us at the Seder but to truly motivate us to global action, then we will truly have made Passover be a night which is different than all others. May we so be inspired.

Chag Kasher V’sameach!
Rabbi/Hazzan David B. Sislen
0 Comments

Parshat of the Week -- Tazria- Parshat Hachesh

4/1/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
Let’s face it. For someone who is facing any type of adversity, being able to parse their future in terms of time is a gift. Being someone who lives in fear of when or if the next bomb will land on their home, if they will be subjugated or oppressed, or if they will become the next target of their government’s discrimination is a fact of life for untold millions around the world. The Ukranians, Rohingya, Uighurs, Tigrays, and so many more souls worldwide cannot look to tomorrow as a solace. They have a day-to-day existence which sensitizes them to trying to survive today rather than planning for the future.

We read the Maftir for Shabbat Hachodesh this week. Near the beginning of the month of Nisan, we prepare to celebrate our deliverance from slavery during Pesach, and the establishment of our Jewish calendar. In light of the traumas which being currently experienced by our fellow b’nai enosh, children of humanity, today, let’s not be haughty and selfish about the blessings we have achieved bayamim hahem bazman hazeh, in those days at this time. Sure, we can and should celebrate the establishment of our calendar, recognize and appreciate the groundwork of our Passover observance. The biblical story, however, is not meant to be a historical anachronism. It should be a present and future imperative. If a nation of slaves, used to constantly doing their masters’ bidding, can tell time and give thanks on their own, should it not follow that they should seek out any others who are imperiled and pay it forward?
Freedom comes with a price. The cost is the necessity to pay it forward to any one and everyone who is not free. Our shul website has a list of multidenominational organizations to which you can easily donate to help Ukranian refugees. Look below for the link to donate. In addition, my beloved colleague Rabbi Ari Goldstein is going soon on a mission to Poland to provide supplies for refugees. A box to collect pain medication for children and adults, as well as vitamin C and D for children is already being filled in our shul lobby.
The blessing of Shabbat Hachodesh is that we can tell time on our terms, guided by Hashem. Let’s make the most of the gift.
Support for Ukraine - Congregation Kneseth Israel in Annapolis, Maryland
Shabbat Shalom!
Rabbi/Hazzan David B. Sislen
0 Comments

Parshat of the Week -- Shemini - Parshat Parah

3/24/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
Your child: “Why do I have to do my chores? Why can’t I stay out later? Why do I have to finish eating my vegetables?”

You: “Because I said so!” (Inner monologue: “OMG, I’ve become my parents!!)”

Not everything that our wisdom, experience, or instinct as parents has relevance or traction with our children. Not everything that we know to be a danger or an imperative will have any meaning to them until they experience the circumstances which led us to the advisory or prohibition. Do you think that the imperatives given to us by Avinu Shebashamayim, our Heavenly Parent,  would be any different?

By all accounts, the laws of the red heifer, read this week with their inherent contradictions, are a logical mystery. It’s seemingly a random Mitzva; the fact that the functionary of a ritual designed to restore holiness to an unclean individual should become ritually impure makes no sense. But maybe that’s the point.

Who knows why a day is 24 hours long? Or why all the planets, (except for maybe Venus?) rotate counterclockwise? Why G-d chose green for plants which clean the air with chlorophyll, or why a platypus, as a mammal, lays eggs?

Sometimes, it’s best to not ask questions, but just accept. I don’t know why our cosmic design does what it does, but I know that I’m thankful for it. I’m grateful for the fact that days happen, and that our planet rotates. I’m not impartial to green, want to preserve the forests which regenerate our oxygen, and am greatly amused by mammals which could play ping-pong with their snouts. Do I know who is responsible? Of course.

Our daily morning service begins with a series of 15 blessings which, directly or by extension, express thanksgiving for all aspects of the good granted to us by G-d which we need for our daily existence. As many of you know, the Hebrew numerical value of 15 is equal to the value (gematria) of the name of the Divine. Every day, we tie our very existence to G-d’s name and influence.

Can I explain or understand it? No. Am I grateful for it? Of course. Will I give thanks for every single daily miracle? Should it, or does it, diminish my faith? Of course not. I may not know why G-d divined what They did, but I am eternally grateful, and will say a blessing for each and every commandment.

Whether it’s obscure laws about a red cow, the fact that the sun rises and sets, that I have rules about what I can eat or not, or the fact that my kid is brilliant, I know who to blame.

It’s because G-d said so.


Shabbat Shalom!

​
Rabbi/Hazzan David B. Sislen
0 Comments

Parshat of the Week -- Tzav

3/18/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
People often ask how the relatively simple instructions for keeping kosher as listed in the Torah grew up to become the often confusing, all-encompassing system of regulations we know today. While the Torah lays out the basics—forbidden animals, the prohibition against consuming blood, the suggestion of separating milk and meat—it does not go into tremendous detail about keeping separate dishes or how things can be “contaminated” by contact. Two of those principles, as later incorporated by the rabbis into the laws of Kashrut, are found in this week’s parsha. At the end of chapter 6 (as well as numerous other places), the notion of the transfer or holy/unholy status through contact is mentioned. Rashi, among others, qualifies the situation as applying to vessels and substances where the flavor of the food can be transferred from one to the other. In this case, the very next verse mentions an earthenware vessel which has contained contaminated food and must be destroyed, since it is impossible to remove the essence of a foodstuff from something as porous as a clay pot. The same is not the case with a nonporous metal pot (the Torah mentions copper, but does not predict non-stick cookware!). Hence our modern tradition that non-kosher pottery cannot be koshered, nor its dairy/meat status reversed. A metal (or glass) vessel, which does not absorb flavor, can be ritually returned to neutral status through hagala, the purging of the item, generally by purifying it in the manner in which it is used (i.e. boiling a pot, heating a pan, etc.). The laws are complicated, but the concept—that the essence of the contamination can be removed unless it has sunk in—has directed the evolution of many of our laws of kashrut.

I believe, however, that there is another level to this set of standards. This week, we celebrated Purim. Last week, on Shabbat Zachor, the Maftir aliya recalled the commandment to eradicate Amalek due to their inherent and incessant cruelty, having attacked Israel by targeting the weakest individuals first. The Haftarah which followed refers to the people’s failure to have done so, leading to the ascendency of Agag, the ancestor of Haman (who is dispatched by the prophet Samuel). The Torah reading for Purim itself similarly refers to the perennial conflict between G-d and Amalek, or good and evil, as being “from generation to generation.” If the Torah’s commandment to wipe out the insidious cruelty had been fulfilled the first time, or the subsequent one, the entire story of Purim would not have happened. We could be eating fried hamentashen on Chanukah!

The nature of modern evil is like that of the impure vessels. Caught early by a world which does not absorb its “flavor,” it should be possible to eradicate it via perfunctory means. Once it has had an opportunity to sink in, however, often the only way its essence will be removed is through destruction of one sort or another. As we look at current events, we realize that there are still many Amaleks in our world, and their actions and influence have imparted an unacceptable amount of impurity to our previously holy vessels. We should let this dual lesson guide and inspire us. It’s certainly preferable to not have the world and its innocents fall victim to insidious or misguided influences. If it does, however, it’s better to take on G-d’s battle to restore our world’s equanimity than to have to deal with its shattered dishes.


Shabbat Shalom!Rabbi/Hazzan David B. Sislen
0 Comments

Parshat of the Week -- Vayikra

3/10/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
This week, we begin reading Vayikra, the book of Leviticus, also known (as suggested by its Latinized Greek name) as Torat Kohanim, the set of instructions for the priests. Indeed, the bulk of the third book of the Bible is fundamentally a user’s manual for the just-completed Mishkan (Tabernacle). The many different types of sacrifices and rituals, along with the fairly graphic details of their proper and timely execution, are enumerated. That makes Vayikra be a fairly tough study for a modern audience for whom the gory details are repugnant, or for whom a more spiritual form of worship is considered more appropriate. The modern practice (ok, “modern” in this case goes back more than a millennium) is to analyze the ancient sacrificial rituals by mining their specifics for homiletical clues as to their purpose. There is much to learn in taking this approach. When an offering is called for, what is offered, who is responsible, the dispensation of the result, and even the egalitarian nature of the requirements can offer tremendously meaningful insights into the meaning of Jewish worship as commanded by the Torah.

While we interpret Torat Kohanim through a modern lens or idealize(?) it as the classic form of ancient worship as was performed in the Holy Temple, we tend to lose sight of the pedigree of the sacrificial system. Animal sacrifice, albeit without the legal and ritual structure, was commonplace in the ancient world; Every generation of patriarchs had practiced it, as did most ancient cultures (with the notion that the human offerings were “feeding” one or more of the multiplicity of gods they worshiped). If G-d was aiming to create a new paradigm of prayer, wouldn’t it have made sense to devise some uniquely Jewish way of achieving closeness with the Divine other than just taking a common and misguided practice and complicating it with lots of rules, regulations, and symbolism? ChaZaL (our blessed sages) teach us that G-d’s initial intention was precisely that; to create a more spiritual system of worship which avoided the vernacular of animal sacrifice. Abravanel (Spain, 1437-1508) suggests that the episode of the Golden Calf taught G-d that Israel wasn’t ready for such an abstract form of worship. They required the structure of ritual to guide them to a spiritual connection with the Holy One. Beginning with the familiar, even though not part of the original plan, was an apt way to begin. Midrash Rabba even comments that it's “better that they bring their offerings to My table than bring them before idols.”

In a way, it seems like the Diaspora transition we have made to a completely liturgical and ritual form of worship may have been in the cards all along; we just weren’t ready for it the first time. Judaism has certainly evolved into a religion with a deeply symbolic, abstract, and personal tradition of approaching G-d. We cannot lose sight, however, of the fact that while we have unique, individual, and often complicated relationships with the Divine, it is still our shared traditions, so deeply rooted despite centuries of evolution, that give these relationships meaning.  What we do, when we do it, what we say while we’re doing it, and, of course, what we don’t do, are still the ways we create, maintain, refresh, and build our spiritual dialog with G-d. Think of it this way: one must do the difficult, physical work of climbing the mountain in order to reach the summit. Only then can one look at the spectacular view, and breathlessly appreciate its beauty, while simultaneously feeling the satisfaction of having had the fortitude to have completed the task.


Shabbat Shalom!Rabbi/Hazzan David B. Sislen
0 Comments

Parshat of the Week -- Pehudei

3/3/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
Over the course of the last few parshas, we have discussed many of the allusions and poetic/symbolic/homiletical references contained in the text. The rundown of the construction process of the Mishkan (tabernacle) is repeated three times; the first commanding the planning and preparation, and second an account of the actual construction, and now the third, where its completion is documented. Among the themes we’ve been following as we study the bottom half of the Book of Shemot (Exodus) this year have been (1) characterizing the creation of the Mishkan by Israel as an echo of G-d’s creation of the Universe, and (2) the unique nature of such a holy thing as G-d’s spiritual dwelling place on earth having been built by willing and inspired human hands which had previously known only the toil of slavery. As we complete Shemot, two subtleties in the parsha reflect these themes.

Exodus 39:32 reads, “All the work of the Tabernacle, the Tent of Meeting, was completed; the Children of Israel had done everything that G-d had commanded Moshe to do.” Sound familiar? Compare this verse to Genesis 2:1-2, where the completion of the original Creation is described: “The heaven and the earth were completed, and all their host. And G-d completed on the seventh day all His work which He had done.” The structure and thematic/linguistic structure of these two verses are virtually identical. There is an initial reference to the process being completed, Genesis’ “All their host” is parallel to Exodus’ “The Children of Israel,” and the one who did the work is identified—G-d in Genesis, and Israel via Moses in Exodus. Just as G-d created the universe and populated it with humans to represent, reflect, and reinforce His teachings, we have now come full circle, having created, through our efforts, a uniquely holy place where we can sense and experience the Divine spirit in our midst.

The fact that it was human generosity, willingness, talent, and effort which built the Mishkan (and continue to support its modern iterations), is of the greatest importance, represented in ways other than a simple reading of the text. Rabbeinu Bachya (1263-1340) calculated that from the beginning of the Mishkan process back in Parshat Truma until the end of Shemot, there are 248 instances of verbs which are derivatives of “to make” referring to various aspects of the project. That number is, of course, a significant one in Jewish numerology. 248 is the number of positive commandments in the Torah, and traditionally regarded as the number of organs/limbs in the body (OK; anatomy wasn’t the rabbis’ strong suit, but recognizing the connection between our physical and spiritual selves certainly was!). This magic number is also the number of words in the Shema, and the gematria (numerological value) of Avraham. The significance of 248 being reflected in the Mishkan is as meaningful as the Tabernacle being a recreation of Creation. It is an echo of all that is positive about our faith, like the Mitzvot. It is the holy result of our physical efforts when dedicated to a higher purpose, like the parts of our bodies. It is a symbol of our belief in the one G-d as declared in the Shema, and the current and future embodiment of the covenant with Avraham.

As we prepare to leave the book of Shemot, we see that Israel has completed this phase of their re-creation as a sovereign people in service of the Holy One. The closing parsha of Exodus connects the people to their past, gives meaning to their present, and positions them for the next chapter of their growth and evolution as a timeless and faithful nation.
Shabbat Shalom!
Rabbi/Hazzan David B. Sislen
0 Comments

Parshat of the Week -- Vaykhel

2/24/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
A cherished former colleague of mine was notorious for multiple phone calls or emails. After the initial contact on a specific issue would come the next one dealing with whatever issue had been omitted in the original. Then the third, and the fourth, all preceded by “Why do in one conversation what you can do in 4?” It seems like this series of parshiyot are doing the same thing. We’ve had two parshas which have laid out the specs and procedures for the building of the Mishkan (Tabernacle). This week in Vayakhel we read the account of the actual preparation and construction. Next week, we’ll read the summation of it all having been done. So why does the Torah repeat its account of the construction process, not counting the internal summaries of the goings-on which also pepper our readings? 

It's because, as significant as Israel building a dwelling place for the spirit of G-d is, the order of operations is equally as important. 

The Talmud tells us that, when the first set of instructions (for the capital campaign and the design of the Ark of the Covenant and other holy accoutrements) were received, Betzalel (the artisan who would oversee the project) asked Moshe, “How can you build what will go on the inside before you have built the place where it will reside?” Moses agreed. Here in Vayakhel, the order is changed. In the report of how construction proceeded, the enclosure is built first, the holy objects which are crucial to its operation second, and the finishing touches on their surroundings third. The last bit, the fashioning of the Kohanim’s garb and the final assembly of the Mishkan, will be read next week. So why the repetition, and why the change of order?

The repetition of the steps of the construction process makes sense. The building of the Mishkan was a one of a kind, never to be repeated event. Never before or since has a nation, giving of their own largesse, talent, and labor, partnered with G-d to build a spiritual dwelling place for the Divine Spirit according to Heavenly specifications. Each and every Israelite has a stake in the Mishkan, and the combined efforts of the entire nation will be reflected in the final product. The Rabbis consider the Mishkan unique in this regard; the Temples in Jerusalem were constructed using non-Jewish labor. That, we are taught, is why they could possibly and tragically have been destroyed, while the Mishkan quietly faded from use and history without having been destroyed, violated, or trashed. I don’t know about you, but if I have an important project to complete, I’ll notate and repeat the various steps necessary for its completion to ensure that they are done correctly and in a timely fashion. Israel, similarly, needed to make certain that they had all the necessary materials on hand, a construction plan, an organized work force, and an efficient schedule. Once the groundwork was laid, the project could proceed. The revised order of operations reflects both a practical and spiritual twist. In construction, the plans and permits must be produced and approved, and the site and its infrastructure must be prepared before the edifice can be started. Here, too, the overall vessel which will contain the holiness must be prepared before the instruments of holiness, most notably the Ark and the Tablets, can be properly contained within. Only then can the whole package be buttoned up and completed. Israel learns, as do we, that Torah without an appropriate home is a spiritual orphan. We must be prepared to accept it, incorporate it with all due respect, then complete the project by securing and finalizing its place in our midst. This lesson, so important to our ancestors, has a resonance for us as well. In our secular lives, as well as in our spiritual endeavors, we can have the tendency to focus on the endgame without savoring the process. Doing so is akin to removing a hot dish from the oven, and then realizing that you have no free space in the kitchen to set it down. The changes to the process in Vayakhel teach us that our partnership with G-d requires that the process proceed in its proper order. That way we avoid being burned.
Rabbi/Hazzan David B. Sislen
0 Comments

Parshat of the Week -- Ki Sisa

2/17/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
The words of the V’shamru are certainly familiar to us (as we would expect from any piece of Bible or liturgy whose name is commonly preceded by the article “the..!”).  Many, perhaps most of us, recite or sing the well-known text on Erev Shabbos, Shabbos morning, and at Shabbos afternoon Kiddush, by rote, without considering the many nuances in these two lines excerpted from this week’s parsha. So let’s dig a little, and unearth some of the remarkable nuances which are contained in this famous text.

To begin with, V’shamru is the continuation of a theme, and the conclusion of a paragraph at that; it is not a stand-alone piece of text as you might expect from seeing it in the siddur. The theme of observing Shabbat was introduced as the 4th commandment back in Yitro. There, the basic gist of the how and why of the Sabbath is given. Here, though, G-d takes it to the next level. The 4 verses preceding V’shamru contain, according to the Rabbis and through literal reading, many new details and concepts. There is an odd word choice in v. 13 (Ach, either “however”, “nevertheless”, or “but”) which suggests that the labors prohibited on Shabbat are those which are involved with the construction of the Tabernacle, but that there would be exclusions, such as saving a life. Shabbat is referred to in the plural, either suggesting that each and every Shabbat should be observed, or that there is a form of duality to the Sabbath—Divine vs. human, the positive commandments we perform on Shabbat vs. the negative commandments we avoid, the Sabbaths we observe completely vs. the ones where we might fall short of the mark. The notion of Shabbat as a sign between the Divine and humankind is introduced, with the goal of Israel being sanctified by G-d for its observance. According to Rashi and others, disregard of Shabbat following a warning as to its consequences is to be a capital offence imposed by the community, but a willful violation without warning will cause G-d to cut the violator off from the nation; in effect, a social and cultural death. Indeed, the lack of observance of this timeless commandment, so often partially or totally disregarded in modernity, has had the effect of causing a spiritual and cultural death or separation of sorts among those who do so. No wonder our tradition tells us that if every Jew would scrupulously observe two Sabbaths in a row, the Messiah will come!

Which brings us to our text—an incredible summary which, given all the subtleties and intricacies which have preceded, blurs the lines between G-d and Man as we discuss the time and place where we meet the closest, Shabbat. The verb “to observe (la’asot)” in the first line is the same verb with which G-d’s establishment of Shabbat in Genesis concludes. The brit, covenant, of Shabbat implies a personal, two-way relationship, rather than a “you will do this because I commanded it” imperative. “Observance of Shabbat is rewarded by holiness” is mirrored by “G-d’s holiness is what inspires the observance of Shabbat.”  More remarkably, G-d refers to Him/Her/Theirself in the first person and in starkly anthropomorphic terms, implying that rest on the 7th day was not merely a cessation of labor, but that G-d required the literal rest, like a human, and was therefore “refreshed (vayinafash).” This final word, of course, is derived from the word nefesh (soul), suggesting the “second soul” we incorporate in partnership and unity with the Divine every Shabbat.

This week, as you recite “the” V’shamru, I hope you will do so with a renewed sense of appreciation. The text, while abundantly familiar, embodies so much nuance that a whole-hearted recitation can truly bring one closer to G-d for those 25 hours when we share common ground in holy partnership—Shabbos.
Rabbi/Hazzan David B. Sislen
0 Comments

Parshat of the Week -- Tetzaveh

2/10/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
In the world of the Mishkan (Tabernacle), where no subtle detail or significance is overlooked, the design of the priestly garments does not disappoint. The Kohen Gadol (High Priest) bears the names and spirit of the nation on his person as much as his dress also represents his service to G-d. On each of his shoulders, the Kohen wears a stone, inscribed with the names of the tribes, 6 to a side. On his chest, he wears the choshen, or breastplate. On its front were four rows of three stones each, engraved with the names of the tribes. The symbolism of Aaron wearing the names of those he is representing as Kohen Gadol is very powerful, indeed. And with the addition of a piece of parchment containing the ineffable name of G-d in the pocket behind the choshen, the breastplate becomes the urim v’tumim (variously: light and completeness, innocent or guilty, oracle and command….), one of the most misunderstood artifacts of all time. 

According to tradition, the stones of the urim v’tumim would be used as a prophetic device to determine G-d’s will in a situation where the desired verdict was of an individual nature, or if a prophet was not available. The Bible relates a few instances in which they were used, but the bulk of the accounts of the urim v’tumim  being consulted come from secondary sources. The folk value of such a divination tool is certainly exciting, and the image of asking a question of the Kohen, and then having the stones light up with the answer is incredibly dramatic. There are a few problems with the biblical equivalent of the Magic 8-Ball (remember those?). First of all, the Torah never says explicitly that the urim v’tumim should be used to determine Divine will. The closest we get is that the choshen is referred to as the choshen mishpat, the “breastplate of justice;” a nebulous description, at best. Furthermore, we know that the Torah is particularly sensitive to fortune-telling devices and individuals. It would be out of character for one to be created and endorsed here. As a result, the urim v’tumim receive a lukewarm reception in the rabbinic literature. They are credited with sometimes giving correct answers, such as determining that the tribe of Judah should be the first to lead the conquering of Canaan after crossing the Jordan (after Rambam). The Vilna Gaon, however, relates that the interpretation is only as good as the practitioner. In the book of I Samuel, he faults the Kohen Eli with misreading the lit stones, concluding that the despondent Hannah is shikora, drunk, instead of k’shera, worthy. Indeed, as the Bible proceeds, the role of this potentially powerful, but inherently problematic icon slowly fades. The account of its actual construction later in Shemot is limited only to its construction; the insertion of the Name or the urim v’tumim are neither mentioned nor suggested. By the time of the late First Temple, according to tradition, the urim v’tumim were hidden along with the Ark of the Covenant, never to be seen or used, for better or worse, again. 

To be honest, I think the fate of the urim v’tumim is apt. It’s presented by the Torah in almost a halting, non-committal fashion, and that’s what it deserves. It’s far too easy to want to look at one magical device or source to receive the answer to your question. Chances are that if you only look one way, you will choose to look in the direction where you are most likely to receive the answer you desire. It’s a far better choice to take inspiration from G-d, using the insight and wisdom which comes from an intimate relationship with the Divine, to determine truth. Sure. It would be great if some oracle could always tell me what to do. But I’d rather ramp up my relationship with G-d so that I can learn how to make that determination myself, in His holy image.
Rabbi/Hazzan David B. Sislen
0 Comments

Parshat of the Week -- Terumah

2/4/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
“They shall make for me a Sanctuary, so that I may dwell among them (Exodus 25:8).” This famous quote, which adorns many Holy Arks the world over, seems like the quintessential expression of how Judaism can sanctify space; we get closer to G-d by inviting Him in, having prepared a suitably holy space, synagogue, yeshiva, etc. in which to do so. The phrase also provides a fitting introduction to this section of the Torah. Most of the bottom half of the Book of Shemot (Exodus) will be concerned with the design and construction of the Mishkan, or Tabernacle. The only exception will be the deviation in a couple of weeks for the Golden Calf story.

The Rabbis, however, call foul. They wonder: how did this nation, mere days past the Revelation at Sinai, lose the sense of holiness and unity that they had achieved when they received the Torah? So much so that we need to spend half of a book of the Bible detailing all of the minutiae of the Mishkan, its equipment, the Priestly garments, its procedures, and so forth. Isn’t this taking a spiritual step backwards; returning to a more iconographic and less sophisticated form of worship rather than the Divine ideal? Rashi, among others, suggests that the sin of the Golden Calf was sufficient to knock Israel from their spiritual pedestal, and, having proven that they can’t remain fully faithful to G-d without symbolic or ritual assistance. The construction of the Mishkan was a reaction to that reality.

Except that the Golden Calf hasn’t happened yet. Or has it? It’s a well-known standard that the Torah does not necessarily work in chronological order. We can tell that this narrative has been jiggered for literary and dramatic effect. The entire Revelation saga has been divided into three disconnected units, with legislation in between. Clearly, G-d calling the people, revealing the Torah, delivering the tablets, the Golden Calf, the aftermath, and the granting of the replacement set could be done in one fell swoop. As we have learned, however, the Torah tweaks the timing and presentation of the story so that certain educational juxtapositions may occur: The dynamic relationship between doing and believing. Revelation vs. Inspiration. Shedding the slave mentality in favor of creating a caring community in the Divine image. It would be a fun exercise to rearrange these narrative and legislative puzzle pieces into different orders to see what the overall message would be with each attempt. In its traditional structure, I find a few useful tools—and lessons.

By breaking up the story, each subpart of the narrative becomes a miniature cause/effect or action/reaction vignette. This allows us to glean, and the Rabbis to expound upon, numerous little connections which we might not have otherwise made. It gives us a chance to analyze the brushstrokes as well as stepping back to admire the painting.

We’ve known since Creation that G-d is an improvisor. Time and time again, we’ve seen radical do-overs, changes in tack, the implementation of alternate strategies. This arc is no different, except that teaching Israel that “try, try again” is an acceptable strategy when you fall short, is part of their fundamental education.

So what’s the takeaway from all of this confusion?

·         Holiness can reside anywhere; provided it is bidden and invited.
·         How you tell the story can be just as important as the story itself.
·         The first place to consider the effects of your words and actions is in the moment.
·         It is still important, however, to look at the big picture.
·         It is in the image of G-d to have something not come off the way you planned, and then to try and fix it, provided you are doing so for the right reasons.

And the beauty of Torah is that next year, we will shuffle the cards again, and learn something completely new.
Rabbi/Hazzan David B. Sislen
0 Comments
<<Previous

    Archives

    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.